I commonly hear the phrase “The web application worked in the pre-production environment and now is encountering issues in production and the server’s configuration are identical!” when I appear onsite to help assist with the resolution of the issues. Upon further investigation, an IIS module has not been installed on the production server, or the configuration is different for an application pool setting between the pre-production and production environments. This is a very common scenario I encounter in the field and here are some suggestions on how to determine differences between IIS servers in an IIS farm environment or between servers in different environments, such as pre-production and production. Keeping server configuration and content synchronized is always a challenge and I hope these suggestions help out.

Angular 2.0 will be built using the TypeScript language. It will embrace TypeScript's idioms for working with immersive web experiences in larger applications.

You can get those same benefits by working with TypeScript and Angular together. In this session, you'll learn how Angular and TypeScript work together to create single page applications. You'll see how you can leverage the features of ECMAScript 6, and still support today's browsers. You'll see how adopting TypeScript can be as easy as changing the extensions on your .js files. How you use the TypeScript features is completely in your control. 

AspNetCoreRateLimit is an ASP.NET Core rate limiting solution designed to control the rate of requests that clients can make to a Web API or MVC app based on IP address or client ID. The AspNetCoreRateLimit package contains an IpRateLimitMiddleware and a ClientRateLimitMiddleware, with each middleware you can set multiple limits for different scenarios like allowing an IP or Client to make a maximum number of calls in a time interval like per second, 15 minutes, etc. You can define these limits to address all requests made to an API or you can scope the limits to each API URL or HTTP verb and path.

React NodeGUI is powered by React ⚛️ and Qt5 💚 which makes it easy to build performant, native and cross-platform desktop applications. 

new Vue({
  // state
  // داده‌ها در اینجا قرار میگیرند
  data () {
    return {
      count: 0
    }
  },
  // view
  // ویوها برای نمایش داده‌ها مورد استفاده قرار میگیرند
  template: `<div>{{ count }}</div>`,
  // actions
  // برای تغییر داده‌ها از متدها استفاده میکنیم
  methods: {
    increment () {
      this.count++
    }
  }
})

یک برنامه ساده با استفاده از Vuex:

یک پروژه Vuejs را ایجاد کنید و مطابق تصویر زیر، گزینه دوم را انتخاب و Enter را فشار دهید:

سپس گزینه Vuex را طبق تصویر زیر با دکمه‌ی space انتخاب کنید و برای مابقی گزینه‌های بعدی با زدن Enter، پیش فرض‌ها را بپذیرید تا پروژه ساخته شود:

دو کامپوننت را به برنامه اضافه میکنیم.

کامپوننت اول با نام increase-counter-component.vue  

<template>
  <div>
    <!--  نمایش شمارشگر  -->
    <h1>{{count}}</h1>
    <!--  افزودن یک واحد به شمارشگر  -->
    <button @click="add">Add 1</button>
    <!--  افزودن مقداری دلخواه به شمارشگر  -->
    <button @click="add2">Add 2</button>
  </div>
</template>

<script>
// یا همان منبع ذخیره داده‌ها store کردن  import
import store from "../store";

export default {
  // You can consider computed properties another view into your data.
  // https://css-tricks.com/methods-computed-and-watchers-in-vue-js/
  computed: { count: () => store.state.count },

  // به دو طریق فراخوانی شده  add تابع
  methods: {
    // بدون پارامتر
    add: () => store.commit("add"),
    // با  پارامتر
    // برای مقدار مورد نظر استفاده کنیم input میتوانیم بجای مقدار ثابت از یک
    add2: () => store.commit("add", 2)
  }
};
</script>

کامپوننت دوم با نام decrease-counter-component.vue  

<template>
  <div>
    <h1>{{count}}</h1>
    <button @click="subtract">Subtract 1</button>
    <button @click="subtract(3)">Subtract 3</button>
  </div>
</template>

<script>
import store from "../store";

export default {
  computed: { count: () => store.state.count },

  methods: {
    subtract: payload => store.commit("subtract", +payload)
  }
};
</script>

<template>
  <div id="app">
    <img alt="Vue logo" src="./assets/logo.png" />
    <counter-plus></counter-plus>
    <hr />
    <hr />
    <counter-minus></counter-minus>
  </div>
</template>

<script>
import counterPlus from "./components/increase-counter-component";
import counterMinus from "./components/decrease-counter-component";
export default {
  name: "app",
  components: {
    "counter-plus": counterPlus,
    "counter-minus": counterMinus
  }
};
</script>

import Vue from 'vue'
import Vuex from 'vuex'

Vue.use(Vuex)

export default new Vuex.Store({
  //  داده‌های به اشتراک گذاشته شده
  state: {
    count: 0
  },
  // تعریف متدها
  mutations: {
    add(state, payload) {
      // If we get a payload, add it to count
      // Else, just add one to count
      payload ? (state.count += payload) : state.count++;
    },
    subtract(state, payload) {
      payload ? (state.count -= payload) : state.count--;
    }
  }
});

npm run serve

npm install

npm run serve

The Problem

What they neglect to say is all that testability and persistence ignorance flies right out the window when you create a new ASP.NET Web Application using the MVC template and "Individual User Accounts" authentication. What you get is a single-layered application, tightly coupled to Entity Framework, that:

• Ignores the patterns that facilitate testing, including: the repository pattern, unit of work pattern, and dependency injection;

• Forces you to implement their IUser interface in your application’s User entity, thereby coupling it to ASP.NET Identity;

• Eliminates any clear separation between your entities, persistence concerns, and business logic. Persistence ignorance? Forget about it.

Thankfully, due to the extensibility designed into ASP.NET Identity, it is possible to ditch the reference to the Microsoft.AspNet.Identity.EntityFramework assembly and write a custom implementation that can address these and other architectural issues. Just be forewarned: it is not a trivial undertaking, and you’ll have to put up with some code smell that is baked into the Microsoft.AspNet.Identity.Core assembly.