Looking at these side-by-side randomly generated visualizations, neither of them seem substantively different from a distribution perspective. All to say, when generating a random color palette, there probably wasn't any need for me to use the Crypto module—I probably should have just stuck with Math. It's much faster and feels to be just as random. I'll leave the Crypto stuff to any client-side cryptography work (which I've never had to do).

An In Depth Look into Random Number Generation in .NET 

Generates random dummy text (Lorem Ipsum). 

DECLARE @char CHAR = ''
DECLARE @charI INT = 0
DECLARE @password VARCHAR(100) = ''
DECLARE @len INT = 12 -- Length of Password
WHILE @len > 0
BEGIN
SET @charI = ROUND(RAND()*100,0)
SET @char = CHAR(@charI)

IF @charI > 48 AND @charI < 122
BEGIN
SET @password += @char
SET @len = @len - 1
END
END
SELECT @password [PassWord]  

V8 JavaScript Engine: There's Math.random(), and then there's Math.random()